An integration nobody owns
The model works in a notebook and the ERP never hears about it. We build the backend and the integrations that carry the answer to where the work happens.
Architectures and software engineered to run in production, not just in a demo. The same team builds the interfaces, the pipelines and the infrastructure underneath.
The model works in a notebook and the ERP never hears about it. We build the backend and the integrations that carry the answer to where the work happens.
The pilot was judged on a handful of curated examples. Nobody knows how it does on last month's real inputs, so nobody dares to switch it on.
The model drifts, the costs climb, the latency creeps up, and the team finds out from a complaint instead of a dashboard.
In production the software is the part your team touches every day: the screen where a reviewer accepts a draft, the API the ERP calls, the job that runs at six in the morning. It is versioned, monitored and documented like any service you already run, and it keeps working when the model is swapped for a better one.
Monitoring is the part the operations director reads twice. Drift, cost and latency sit on one dashboard, alerts reach the people who can act, and when the system is unsure it hands the case to a person with the evidence attached instead of guessing.
The product around the model: backends, integrations and interfaces built to last.
Pipelines, inference, monitoring and MLOps that keep systems running and improving.
An AI analyst that reads the filings, listens to the calls and drafts the memo before the meeting.
A system that watches the production line and explains a stoppage before an engineer has to ask.
Yes. We start with an architecture review of what exists, tell you plainly what can stay and what cannot, and build from there. Taking over is common; rebuilding from scratch is rare.
Yes. If your problem is a platform, an integration or an app, that is a project for us. The same team, the same standard, no model unless the problem needs one.
Usually not all of it. The model and the idea are often sound; what is missing is evaluation, integration and monitoring. We add those around what works and replace only what would fail under load.
Yes. We work in your repositories, your accounts and your review process, with your conventions. Nothing lives on our side that you cannot see.
In your environment. Your cloud account, EU regions you approve, or fully on-premise when the domain requires it. We deploy into your accounts, never into ours.
The one your team can run afterwards. We choose boring, well-supported technology by default and justify every exception in writing before we use it.
Named engineers with least-privilege access, revoked at hand-over, and every access to production data logged. Nothing trains a shared model, and nothing leaves the environment you approved.
Your team, if you want, or us for as long as you need. Either way the documentation, the tests and the runbooks are part of the delivery, not an extra.
Evaluated on real cases, integrated with the systems around it, monitored for drift, cost and latency, with a person on the decisions that matter and a runbook for the day something breaks.
Automated tests from the first sprint, a review on every change and a staging environment that mirrors production. A feature is done when it runs for real users, not when it compiles.

Tell us what you are building and what changes if it works. You get a straight answer on whether AI can solve it.
Talk to usor write to hello@maistik.studio